Explore the Annual Review of Psychology—the world’s top-ranked annual journal (IF ≈ 23–32) offering authoritative, peer-reviewed reviews across psychology disciplines since 1950. Published by Annual Reviews.
Since its first volume in 1950, the Annual Review of Psychology has remained the gold standard for in-depth, authoritative review articles in psychology. Published by Annual Reviews, this journal synthesizes major advances across the psychological sciences each year—making it essential reading for researchers, clinicians, and advanced students.
Key Facts & Rankings
- ISSN: 0066-4308 (print), 1545-2085 (electronic)
- Publisher: Annual Reviews (USA)
- History: Continuous publication since 1950
- Frequency: Annually (one volume per year)
Impact & Influence:
- 2023 Impact Factor: 23.6, ranking #1 among 92 journals in “Psychology (Science)” and 218 in “Psychology, Multidisciplinary (Social Science)”
- Some sources suggest higher values (e.g., 27–32 based on Scopus metrics), and it consistently falls in the 99–100th percentile in Q1 rankings.
Scope & Editorial Vision
Annual Review of Psychology presents comprehensive, peer-reviewed reviews summarizing major developments across psychology, covering topics like:
- Biological foundations of behavior
- Cognitive processes, perception, and attention
- Developmental and educational psychology
- Clinical and counseling psychology, psychopathology
- Social, personality, environmental, and community psychology
- Animal learning, evolutionary perspectives, and behavioral ecology
A curated editorial committee, led by Susan T. Fiske since 2000, solicits review articles from leading experts—unsolicited manuscripts are not accepted.
Editorial Standards & Process
- A lead editor and editorial committee guide content selection
- Topics are chosen annually, and prominent scholars are invited to draft reviews
- Manuscripts undergo peer review within the committee before publication
This model ensures cohesion, quality, and state-of-the-art analysis in every volume.
Why It Matters
- Citations: Review articles in this journal drive citation numbers and offer essential reference points for emerging and established researchers
- Topical Overviews: Recognized as foundational reads for entering new areas—though some essays caution that the most recent 5–10 years are best as starting points
- Academic Value: Highly respected across psychology subfields, influencing clinical, developmental, social, and cognitive psychology.
Audience & Reach
- Psychologists & clinicians seeking comprehensive literature updates
- Graduate students needing authoritative overviews
- Policy-makers and educators informed by rigorous psychological analysis
- Interdisciplinary professionals working in neuroscience, cognitive science, public health, and behavioral research
Top Landmark Reviews
1. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective”
- Author: Albert Bandura
- Citations: ~7,752
- Why it matters: This foundational article reshaped how psychologists understand human behavior, emphasizing self‑efficacy, goal setting, and self-regulation. It remains one of the most-cited psychology papers ever.
2. “On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well‑Being”
- Author: Ed Diener and others
- Citations: ~5,704
- Why it matters: Offers a comprehensive evaluation of what constitutes true well‑being—distinguishing between pleasure (hedonia) and meaningful life (eudaimonia). A fundamental reference in positive psychology.
3. “Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It”
- Author: Multiple-method bias scholars
- Citations: ~5,081
- Why it matters: Critical for understanding and mitigating methodological biases—essential for ensuring robust research across psychology and beyond .
Recent High-Impact Topics
Although classic reviews form the backbone of foundational knowledge, recent issues have introduced influential modern overviews:
- “Neurophysiology of Remembering” (2021, vol. 73)—György Buzsáki et al.
Explores hippocampal mechanisms underlying memory, integrating neural dynamics and spatial cognition. A must-read for cognitive neuroscience. - “Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Subjective Experience of Remembering” (Simons et al.)
Provides insights into the neuronal correlates of recalling memories, blending psychology and neuroimaging.
How to Use These Reviews
- Foundational Theory: Start with the classics—for instance, Bandura’s social cognitive theory or Diener’s work on well-being—to understand enduring theoretical frameworks.
- Updated Insights: Supplement with recent volumes (e.g., memory, social behavior, clinical psychology) to stay current.
- Citation Awareness: While classics are well-cited, they may reflect older paradigms. Balance historical knowledge with recent advances—preferably reviews under 10 years old.
Summary Table
| Article Title | Author(s) | Year | Area | Why Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective | Bandura | Classic | Social Psychology | Foundational behavior theory |
| On Happiness and Human Potentials | Diener et al. | Classic | Positive Psychology | Defines well-being dimensions |
| Sources of Method Bias… | Method bias scholars | Classic | Methodology | Research validity |
| Neurophysiology of Remembering | Buzsáki et al. | 2021 | Cognitive Neuroscience | Memory and hippocampus |
| Brain Mechanisms Underlying… | Simons et al. | 2021 | Neuroscience | Imaging memory recall |
Follow JSTOR ONLINE for more updates!